🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest is no longer a fundamental right. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that authorities allow or deny at their discretion. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the current government is advancing, which would determine the timing and location demonstrations can occur, with potential imprisonment for those who disobey these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous administrations had already undermined this essential right: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and unjustified limitations" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these progressive assaults on freedom have practically eliminated the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Atrocity to Justify Crackdown

The latest restrictive measures are being defended by citing last week's heinous anti-Jewish assault on a Manchester mosque. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the security of British Jews must be protected. However, using this atrocity as a justification to stifle dissent is not only unrelated to that duty but perverts it.

"When you can't draw the line at mass killing, you probably cannot draw the line at democracy," observed a prominent American author, a statement that rings true for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's rich history of public demonstration and direct action against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as extremists in their era, even while they were advocating the rights of minorities.

Current Reality

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's actually occurring: The Israeli government – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have described as systematic destruction. Its warfare have led the global justice body to release arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

Western public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public believe Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would support a complete ban on arms sales to the state, and approve the detention of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely failed the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to try to suppress a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems involved in this effort. Government officials have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish identity with the actions of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also harmful. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately questioned for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where law enforcement can suggest that protests criticizing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or deliberately" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have declared that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made organizations "implicated" in supposed mistreatment experienced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from two years of daily atrocities that have claimed tens of thousands of human lives. British politicians and media outlets have barely concealed the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of discrimination in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a peaceful, anti-genocide activist collective. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, primarily for carrying signs against mass killing and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are pensioners; including a retired priest and the child of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "linked with" other nations, while the current president described such demonstrations as antisemitic. In doing so, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to control dissent. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors fought, suffered and sacrificed their lives to secure our freedoms. We may ultimately rue how easily we permitted them to be eroded.